Manchester United tell Ander Herrera they'll be back for him in January as details of deal's complications emerge
Legal complications put a halt to United's deal for the Athletic Bilbao star
Manchester United have assured Ander Herrera they will return in January to sign him, after losing their nerve when the proposed £30.4m transfer hit late complications .
United were scared off by legal implications which meant they had to pay every penny of the fee up front immediately, and could also potentially have faced an increase of anything from 20 to 50 per cent, despite promising the Athletic Bilbao player they would meet his buy out clause.
United’s worries about the spiraling fee - and particularly about the need to find such a huge sum that evening when they believed they had a month to pay - led to a farcical situation where it was claimed IMPOSTERS arrived at La Liga headquarters, to try to muscle in on the deal and claim a cut.
In fact, the Mirror can reveal that far from being imposters, the three representatives who arrived at the league offices in Madrid were in fact sports law EXPERTS, who were sent to speak to La Liga officials to try to unravel the massively complicated deal.
Our understanding is that because United left it so late, there was simply no time to get a definitive resolution to a difficult situation, and no chance of raising such a massive figure on the spot...and so they dramatically pulled the plug.
That has left the player bitterly disappointed and suspicious that he was used as a ploy to help the Old Trafford club in their attempt to prise Marouane Fellaini from Everton, despite the subsequent promise to return in January.
The complications arose because Herrera’s club Bilbao did not want to sell, as they have a policy of signing only players of Basque descent and are therefore loathe to lose any stars born in the region.
Every Spanish player has a formal release clause under La Liga rules, and usually, when a buying club offers the amount set, they simply strike a deal with the player’s club and pay the amount.
When a club doesn’t want to sell though, the player himself is technically obliged to deposit the clause sum with the league - and Bilbao took that stance before the window closed. It got worse though, because under those circumstances, the fee can be subject to an extra 20 per cent VAT bill, and even leave the player himself with a 50 per cent tax bill.
As the deadline approached and with United suddenly very nervous about the potential extra fee, the player’s agents and United’s intermediary sent sports law experts from the Bilboa legal firm Laffer Abagadosa to league headquarters in a desperate attempt to clarify the situation.
United had first offered a fee of around £25m plus an additional £5m if the midfielder hit a set target of goals, but that was rejected out of hand. Then they were led to believe they had a month under league rules to resolve the legal situation and pay the buy out clause.
But when the three lawyers - identified as Guillermo Gutierrez, Alvaro Reig and Rodrigo Garcia - travelled to Madrid and spoke at 7-30pm with league representatives, they discovered the one month’s grace period before the money had to be stumped up applied only to transfers between Spanish clubs.
They also found they needed power of attorney from Herrera, and advised United there was no way at that stage La Liga officials could guarantee there would be no extra costs added onto the deal.
The player was understandably devastated after being promised by United they WOULD meet the buy out clause, and even agreeing a five year contract worth around £65,000 a week, even though that meant taking a pay cut, given the tax advantages offered in Bilbao to Basque natives.
But it is understood United have now assured Herrera that they will return in January with a fresh offer to Athletic Bilbao, which offers sufficient time to take legal instruction which would clear any tax implications to the deal.
The farcical situation though, serves only to further add to the perception that United simply didn’t do their homework in the window, and were thrashing around wildly as they left it far too late to complete their business.
United were scared off by legal implications which meant they had to pay every penny of the fee up front immediately, and could also potentially have faced an increase of anything from 20 to 50 per cent, despite promising the Athletic Bilbao player they would meet his buy out clause.
United’s worries about the spiraling fee - and particularly about the need to find such a huge sum that evening when they believed they had a month to pay - led to a farcical situation where it was claimed IMPOSTERS arrived at La Liga headquarters, to try to muscle in on the deal and claim a cut.
In fact, the Mirror can reveal that far from being imposters, the three representatives who arrived at the league offices in Madrid were in fact sports law EXPERTS, who were sent to speak to La Liga officials to try to unravel the massively complicated deal.
Our understanding is that because United left it so late, there was simply no time to get a definitive resolution to a difficult situation, and no chance of raising such a massive figure on the spot...and so they dramatically pulled the plug.
That has left the player bitterly disappointed and suspicious that he was used as a ploy to help the Old Trafford club in their attempt to prise Marouane Fellaini from Everton, despite the subsequent promise to return in January.
The complications arose because Herrera’s club Bilbao did not want to sell, as they have a policy of signing only players of Basque descent and are therefore loathe to lose any stars born in the region.
Handout
They have shown that clearly in the past when fighting so hard
to keep Fernando Llorente and Javi Martinez - whose move to Bayern
Munich was described by the German club as “the most difficult and
complicated” transfer they’ve ever done. And yet United gave themselves
barely half a day to do the deal.Every Spanish player has a formal release clause under La Liga rules, and usually, when a buying club offers the amount set, they simply strike a deal with the player’s club and pay the amount.
When a club doesn’t want to sell though, the player himself is technically obliged to deposit the clause sum with the league - and Bilbao took that stance before the window closed. It got worse though, because under those circumstances, the fee can be subject to an extra 20 per cent VAT bill, and even leave the player himself with a 50 per cent tax bill.
As the deadline approached and with United suddenly very nervous about the potential extra fee, the player’s agents and United’s intermediary sent sports law experts from the Bilboa legal firm Laffer Abagadosa to league headquarters in a desperate attempt to clarify the situation.
United had first offered a fee of around £25m plus an additional £5m if the midfielder hit a set target of goals, but that was rejected out of hand. Then they were led to believe they had a month under league rules to resolve the legal situation and pay the buy out clause.
But when the three lawyers - identified as Guillermo Gutierrez, Alvaro Reig and Rodrigo Garcia - travelled to Madrid and spoke at 7-30pm with league representatives, they discovered the one month’s grace period before the money had to be stumped up applied only to transfers between Spanish clubs.
They also found they needed power of attorney from Herrera, and advised United there was no way at that stage La Liga officials could guarantee there would be no extra costs added onto the deal.
John Peters
It was at the stage, close to 10pm - just as the player’s
agent authorised a power of attorney - that United dramatically pulled
the plug, as they lost their nerve with the deadline ticking down, the
banks closed and the potential for extra costs. Even a club like United
can not simply write a cheque for a figure of £30m.The player was understandably devastated after being promised by United they WOULD meet the buy out clause, and even agreeing a five year contract worth around £65,000 a week, even though that meant taking a pay cut, given the tax advantages offered in Bilbao to Basque natives.
But it is understood United have now assured Herrera that they will return in January with a fresh offer to Athletic Bilbao, which offers sufficient time to take legal instruction which would clear any tax implications to the deal.
The farcical situation though, serves only to further add to the perception that United simply didn’t do their homework in the window, and were thrashing around wildly as they left it far too late to complete their business.
No comments:
Post a Comment