Oscar Pistorius appears at the Magistrate Court in Pretoria on February 22, 2013.
Photo by ALEXANDER JOE/AFP/Getty Images
Photo by ALEXANDER JOE/AFP/Getty Images
Back in February, before the Tsarnaevs and Ariel Castro came into our lives, it looked like the Oscar Pistorius case
was going to be the crime story of the year. You'll remember the
basics: Pistorius, the double-amputee South African sprinter dubbed
"Blade Runner" because of his carbon-fiber prostheses, was arrested this
February and charged with shooting and killing his girlfriend, model
and law student Reeva Steenkamp. Pistorius claimed that he mistook
Steenkamp for a burglar, an alibi that was far from ironclad. Some South
African cities are rife with property crimes, yes, but Pistorius was
also an enthusiastic gun owner with an aggressive streak who had been
accused of violence against women. He also shot Steenkamp through the
closed bathroom door, which is, at the very least, extraordinarily
reckless behavior.
Is Pistorius a murderer? A long new Vanity Fair piece
fills in a lot of details about the saga and its major figures, but
doesn’t come all that close to answering that question. The story, by
the excellent Mark Seal, is not kind to Pistorius. The athlete is
depicted as an aggressive narcissist addicted to caffeine pills and
energy drinks, a thrill-seeking womanizer who let fame go to his head
and used foul language around children while training at the gym. After
the London Olympics and all the attendant publicity, Seal reports, his
behavior only got worse:
“He was bragging about his adventures in the good life,” a former confidant told me. “He was like, ‘I’m the man, I’m Oscar. The world owes me.’ That sense of entitlement. He wasn’t like that; he was made into that.” His friends, the confidant continued, changed from “the good old lads” to “the Southern Jo’burg tattooed skinhead-gang type. He surrounded himself with people who used violence and rage as an outlet for whatever you feel. God forbid, I didn’t see it going to this point. But I knew something was going to crack.” Even Gianni Merlo, the Italian journalist who helped Pistorius write his autobiography, wondered, “Have we unwittingly cultivated a monster?”
After reading Seal’s piece, I’m convinced that Oscar Pistorius is
kind of a jerk. But while the piece definitely nudges the reader toward
the conclusion that he murdered Steenkamp, it hasn’t cleared up all
reasonable doubt. Lots of athletes and high-achieving people are
aggressive jerks. But from where I’m sitting, it’s still possible that
the jittery, aggressive Pistorius believed he was shooting at a burglar.
Pistorius is a guy who, as I wrote in February, once tweeted about mistaking his noisy washing machine for a burglar. The Times of London reported on Pistorius’ “excess energy,” how he struggled to fall asleep. “He told the New York Times
that when a house security alarm went off recently, he grabbed the gun
he kept by his bed and crept downstairs. It turned out to be nothing,”
the paper reported. Pistorius seems like exactly the sort of person who
might shoot first and ask questions later.
One of Seal’s main sources is Hilton Botha,
the police detective who offered inconsistent testimony during
Pistorius’ bail hearing, and who has since resigned from the force.
Botha’s credibility was further damaged when it came out that he was
himself facing charges of attempted murder. (Botha explains away those
charges near the end of the story—he was merely shooting at the tires of
a taxi that had forced his police car off the road, he tells Seal.)
Botha’s bid at redemption here comes across as self-serving and
unconvincing. It would’ve been nice if Seal had found some other police
source to back up Botha’s characterization of the evidence against
Pistorius—he argues that the angle of the bullet holes in the bathroom
door and the placement of the bullet casings in the bathroom prove that
Pistorius shot from close range with his prosthetic legs on—as well as
Botha’s characterization of himself as a good cop. If you believe Botha,
then there’s no way Pistorius didn’t do it. But I’m not as sure as Seal seems to be that we should trust Botha.
Anyway, you should read the entire piece yourself. It probably won’t
change your mind about the case one way or the other, but it’s full of
good details and good reporting—the perfect refresher on a story that
isn’t going away anytime soon. ------------------------- Slate
No comments:
Post a Comment